The Bill He Wouldn't Pay
Grover Beach requires short-term rental operators to send the city 12% of rental income as Transient Occupancy Tax. Thompson ran a rental. The city says he didn't send it from 2019 through 2022.
-
August 22, 2022$16,000
After a heated debate, the City Council revoked his short-term rental license. Thompson argued he didn't owe the tax, citing his own reading of the city's "hotel" definition and a private conversation with then-Mayor Jeff Lee.
New Times San Luis Obispo
-
January 20, 2023$30,000
The city sued him, claiming nearly $30,000 plus 1.5% monthly interest. The complaint listed nine causes of action. The city alleged unremitted taxes, fraud and negligent misrepresentation.
New Times San Luis Obispo
-
The auditRefused
Thompson wouldn't open his books. So the city hired a consultant who rebuilt the bill from booking data.
New Times San Luis Obispo
-
February 14, 2023$39,043.75
He settled. The total covered back taxes, interest and penalties. City Attorney David Hale told the council: "He has seven days to send a check to the city."
New Times San Luis Obispo
Where That Money Goes
Transient Occupancy Tax is a tax on visitors' stays. Every operator in town collects it and sends it to City Hall. Hotels do it. Hundreds of rental hosts do it.
That money funds the city that residents live in. Thompson decided the rule didn't apply to him until a lawsuit said otherwise.
The Question for District 2
He wants a vote on the city budget.
The last time Thompson dealt with that budget, he held back the city's share, fought the bill at a public hearing, refused the audit and settled once the city took him to court.
Taxes are a fair thing to argue about. Keeping money that belongs to the city is a different thing. District 2 deserves a council member who pays what everyone else pays.
Sources
- New Times San Luis Obispo, "Grover Beach sues former short-term rental owner for tax evasion," January 2023
- New Times San Luis Obispo, "Grover Beach reaches tax evasion settlement with former short-term rental owner," February 2023
The case was a civil lawsuit. It was to be dismissed with prejudice once he paid. No admission of wrongdoing was reported.